Delphi, regular users have noticed, can change its mind from time to time. Ask Delphi that question now, and you may get a different answer from an updated version of the program. When a software developer stumbled onto Delphi, she asked the system if she should die so she wouldn’t burden her friends and family. Others found the system woefully inconsistent, illogical and offensive. Still, she was somewhat impressed by its ability to respond, though she knew a human ethicist would ask for more information before making such pronouncements.
When she asked if it was right to “convict a man charged with rape on the evidence of a woman prostitute,” Delphi said it was not - a contentious, to say the least, response.
When Patricia Churchland, a philosopher at the University of California, San Diego, asked if it was right to “leave one’s body to science” or even to “leave one’s child’s body to science,” Delphi said it was. Once it was released to the open internet, many others agreed that the system was surprisingly wise. Choi and her team said a group of human judges - again, digital workers - thought that Delphi’s ethical judgments were up to 92 percent accurate. In an academic paper describing the system, Dr. Choi and her team for exploring an important and thorny area of technological research, others argued that the very idea of a moral machine is nonsense. researchers? Product managers? Mark Zuckerberg? Trained philosophers and psychologists? Government regulators? The question is: Who gets to teach ethics to the world’s machines? A.I. It is also a reminder that the morality of any technological creation is a product of those who have built it.
systems more ethically informed, socially aware and culturally inclusive,” said Yejin Choi, the Allen Institute researcher and University of Washington computer science professor who led the project.ĭelphi is by turns fascinating, frustrating and disturbing. And the creators of Delphi hope to build an ethical framework that could be installed in any online service, robot or vehicle. Algorithms used by courts, parole offices and police departments make parole and sentencing recommendations that can seem arbitrary.Ī growing number of computer scientists and ethicists are working to address those issues. Social networks like Facebook and Twitter fail to control hate speech, despite wide deployment of artificial intelligence.
Facial recognition systems and digital assistants show bias against women and people of color.
0 kommentar(er)
